IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 322 GURINDER SINGH @ GURINDER SINGH GURI AND OTHERS STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) 1. Deputy Superintendent of Police, South Sub Chandigarh on behalf of respondent No.1 in the Court today, whi on record subject to all just exceptions. 2. Court that petitioner No.1 is involved in multiple criminal cases involving identical allegations, wherein innocent persons have been duped hard-earned money on false assurance of sending them abroad. Standing counsel has, therefore, submitted that on this ground alone, the instant petition deserves to be set aside as the criminal antecedents of petitioner No.1 would come in his way. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM- Date of decision: GURINDER SINGH @ GURINDER SINGH GURI AND OTHERS Versus UT CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. T.P.S. Bawa, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Kanwar Pal Singh, Addl. P.P., Mr. Ritesh Tomar, Advocate for respondent No.2. MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) Learned Standing counsel for the U.T. has filed reply of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, South Sub Chandigarh on behalf of respondent No.1 in the Court today, whi on record subject to all just exceptions. Learned Standing counsel has brought to the notice of this Court that petitioner No.1 is involved in multiple criminal cases involving identical allegations, wherein innocent persons have been duped earned money on false assurance of sending them abroad. Standing counsel has, therefore, submitted that on this ground alone, the instant petition deserves to be set aside as the criminal antecedents of petitioner No.1 would come in his way. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -M-20376-2025 Date of decision: July 15, 2025 GURINDER SINGH @ GURINDER SINGH GURI AND OTHERS ...Petitioners UT CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Kanwar Pal Singh, Addl. P.P., U.T. Chandigarh. Learned Standing counsel for the U.T. has filed reply of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, South Sub-Division, Sector-34, U.T., Chandigarh on behalf of respondent No.1 in the Court today, which is taken Learned Standing counsel has brought to the notice of this Court that petitioner No.1 is involved in multiple criminal cases involving identical allegations, wherein innocent persons have been duped of their earned money on false assurance of sending them abroad. Learned Standing counsel has, therefore, submitted that on this ground alone, the instant petition deserves to be set aside as the criminal antecedents of s s Learned Standing counsel for the U.T. has filed reply of the 34, U.T., ch is taken Learned Standing counsel has brought to the notice of this Court that petitioner No.1 is involved in multiple criminal cases involving of their Learned Standing counsel has, therefore, submitted that on this ground alone, the instant petition deserves to be set aside as the criminal antecedents of Jaspreet Kaur 2025.07.15 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-20376 3. petitioner No.1 may be involved in multiple criminal cases, however, as far as petitioners No.2 and 3 are concerned, they have no previous criminal antecedents, and hence, question be quashed. 4. material placed on record. 5. it would amount to partial quashing of the FIR in question, which is contrar to the settled law. 6. the petitioners for withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to pleas before the learned trial Court. 7. with liberty aforesaid. July 15, 2025 Jaspreet Kaur 20376-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no doubt petitioner No.1 may be involved in multiple criminal cases, however, as far as petitioners No.2 and 3 are concerned, they have no previous criminal antecedents, and hence, qua at least petitioners No.2 and 3, the FIR in estion be quashed. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material placed on record. No ground is made out to accept the prayer of the petitioners as it would amount to partial quashing of the FIR in question, which is contrar to the settled law. At this stage, a request has been made by learned counsel for the petitioners for withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to pleas before the learned trial Court. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dism with liberty aforesaid. July 15, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- petitioners submits that no doubt petitioner No.1 may be involved in multiple criminal cases, however, as far as petitioners No.2 and 3 are concerned, they have no previous criminal at least petitioners No.2 and 3, the FIR in I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the No ground is made out to accept the prayer of the petitioners as it would amount to partial quashing of the FIR in question, which is contrary At this stage, a request has been made by learned counsel for the petitioners for withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to raise all Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No petitioners submits that no doubt petitioner No.1 may be involved in multiple criminal cases, however, as far as petitioners No.2 and 3 are concerned, they have no previous criminal at least petitioners No.2 and 3, the FIR in I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the No ground is made out to accept the prayer of the petitioners as y At this stage, a request has been made by learned counsel for raise all issed as withdrawn Jaspreet Kaur 2025.07.15 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh