APHC010149762019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 293 OF 2019 Between: 1. KORRA RAMBABU, S/o.late Korra Narayana, Age.46Years, Occ.Cultivation, R/o.Minumuluru Village, Paderu Mandal, Visakhapatnam District ...Petitioner AND 1. B CHALAM, District Forest Officer, Visakhapantam District. 2. Sri Ram Naresh, Forest Range Officer, Chodavaram Range, Visakhapatnam ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: REDDY VENKATA RAMANA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR FORESTS (AP) Counsel for the Respondents:V SUJATHA The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Reddy Venkata Ramana, learned Counsel for the Contempt Petitioner and Sri T.S. Rayulu, learned Counsel for the Respondents. 2. Learned Counsel for the Contempt Petitioner seeks to withdraw this Contempt Case on the ground that in the prayer of the Writ Petition, it has been wrongly stated that the teak trees of the Petitioner are situated in Sy.No.108/A for an extent of Ac.2.47 cents. Learned Counsel for the 2 Contempt Petitioner would submit that, on verification of facts and the Pattadar Pass Book, the Petitioner has realised his mistake that a wrong prayer has been made in the Writ Petition. Learned Counsel would submit that the Petitioner ought to have mentioned an extent of Ac.2.44 cents in Sy.No.108/B instead of Ac.2.47 cents in Sy.No.108/A. 3. Having regard to these submissions, this Court deems it appropriate to permit the Petitioner to withdraw this Contempt Case. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Petitioner to file fresh Writ Petition, if so advised. No Order as to Costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 03.12.2025 JKS 3 87 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 293 OF 2019 03.12.2025 JKS