[2025:RJ-JP:3821] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1174/2025 1. Kailash S/o Moolchand, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Ward No. 33 Pachar Road, Kishangarh Renwal, Police Station Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur. 2. Banwari Lal S/o Moolchand, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Ward No. 33 Pachar Road, Kishangarh Renwal, Police Station Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur. 3. Mohit S/o Kailash, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No. 33 Pachar Road, Kishangarh Renwal, Police Station Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/01/2025 1. The instant pre-arrest bail application has been filed under Section 482 B.N.S.S. filed on behalf of the petitioners, who are having apprehension of arrest in FIR No.311/2024 registered at Police Station Renwal, District Jaipur Rural for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 333 & 303(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that only one grievous injury has been found on the person of injured. It is submitted that parties have resolved their dispute amicably which is evident from the impugned order dated [2025:RJ-JP:3821] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1174/2025] 17.01.2025. Learned counsel contends that omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioners in the statement of victim. It is contended that other co-accused persons have been granted benefit of bail by this Court as well as by learned trial court. Learned counsel argues that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required in this matter. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the petitioners and especially the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the pre-arrest bail application. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Renwal, District Jaipur Rural in FIR No. 311/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners – (1) Kailash S/o Moolchand, (2) Banwari Lal S/o Moolchand, & (3) Mohit S/o Kailash, they shall be released on bail, provided each of them shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to their satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i). that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or [2025:RJ-JP:3821] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1174/2025] promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /349