Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:70071 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1050 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt. Sangeeta Gond Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shitala Sahay Srivastav,Sudhir Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Execution Case No. 1380 of 2024, arising out of complaint case no. 1406 of 2022 under Section 12 Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, , Police Station Kotwali, District Jaunpur pending in the Court of Civil Judge, New Court No.10, Jaunpur, expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the daughter of opposite party no.2. When she was harassed, an application under Section 12 Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, was moved by her to get the maintenance amount from the opposite party no.2 / father. The said application was decided and an order was passed against the opposite party no.2 to pay Rs. 3000/- per month to the applicant and Rs. 3,00,000/- as compensation towards mental, physical, emotional harassment and suffering and other expenses. It is also submitted that when the said order was not complied with by the opposite party no.2, the aforesaid execution case was filed. It is further submitted that in the said proceeding the opposite party no.2 did not appear and publication was also made by the Court concerned. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the entire record. 5. It reveals from the perusal of the record that the Court concerned is taking proper interest in the proceeding of the case and even publication has been made against the opposite party no.2 - father. However, the Court concerned is directed to decide the aforesaid execution case in accordance with law within two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, if there is no legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted. 6. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 7. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 2.5.2025 safi Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad