Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46176 (MAD)

THE BRANCH MANAGER v. PARVATHY

CMA/1082/2024 · 2025-06-25

T V Thamilselvi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMA NO. 1082 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CMA NO. 1082 of 2024 and CMP.No.10032 of 2024 The Branch Manager Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co.Ltd., Old No.113 and 114, New No.18 and 20, No.4B, 4th Floor, A Block, Mena Kampala Arcade, Sir Theyagaraya Road, T. Nagar, Chennai - 017. Appellant(s) Vs PARVATHY W/o. Pushpanathan, Res. at Annai Theresa Nagar, Kolathur Konnur Via, Villivakkam, Ayanavaram, Chennai. Now res. at D.No.506, Nandhi Nagar, TNSTC Colony Backside, Collectorate Post, Dharmapuri Tk and Dt. and 3 Others Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.M.Krishnamoorthy For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Udhayakumar For R1 To R3 R4 - Notice Dispensed With https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ORDER Today, the matter is listed under the caption "for being mentioned", at the instance of the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. Mr.M.Krishnamoorthy, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr.S.Udhayakumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 are present. 3. It is brought to the notice of this Court that certain errors have crept in paragraph Nos.1 & 7 of the Judgment dated 25.06.2025. Accordingly, Paragraph Nos.1 & 7 in the said order shall stand deleted and replaced. Further, paragraph Nos.1, 7, 8, 9 & 10 shall be included as follows: " Challenging the impugned award passed by the Presiding Officer, Exclusive Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dharmapuri in MCOP.No.165 of 2019, dated 12.01.2024, the appellant / 5th respondent insurance company has preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. ........ 7. On perusal of award, it is seen that no reasons were https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis adduced on behalf of the appellant as well as 4th respondent, both the owner of the vehicle and the insurance company. Therefore, the plea of negligence as raised by the appellant is not sustainable. While awarding compensation, the Tribunal noted that the deceased was unmarried. However, the Tribunal erroneously applied a deduction of 2/3rd towards personal expenses, whereas it should have been 1/2. In this regard, the objections raised by the appellant is valid. Accordingly, a deduction of 50% towards personal living expenses is to be applied. 8. In view of the above discussion, the award is modified is as follows: Calculation Notional Income = Rs.15,309/- Add 40% Future Prospects = 15,309 + 6,124 = 21,433/- After 1/2 deduction = 21,433 x 1/2 = Rs.10,716/- Loss of dependency = Rs.10,716 x 12 x 18 = Rs.23,14,656/- Sl. No Compensation awarded under the head Amount (in Rs.). awarded by the High Court 1 Loss of Dependency 23,14,656 2 Loss of Consortium Rs.40,000x 3 1,20,000 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Sl. No Compensation awarded under the head Amount (in Rs.). awarded by the High Court 3 Loss of Estate 15,000 3 Funeral expenses 15,000 Total 24,64,656/- Rounded off to Rs.24,64,700/- 9. The Learned counsel also raised objections with regard to take-home salary, which was stated to be only Rs.12,519/- as per the evidence of P.W.3. However, it is an admitted fact that the deceased was working as a customer Relationship Executive in Talentpro India HR Pvt. Ltd. earning a gross monthly salary of Rs.15,309/- per month. The accident occurred in the year 2018. Considering the cost of living during that period and the inclusion of various allowances, this Court is inclined to fix the notional monthly income, at Rs.15,309/-. Therefore, the salary fixed by the Tribunal is found to be appropriate and sustainable. 10. Accordingly, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is reduced from Rs.32,07,200/- to Rs.24,64,700/-. The appellant / insurance company is directed to deposit the balance amount, if any, within a period of eight(8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Upon such deposit, respondents 1 to 3 are permitted to withdraw the amount as per https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis their respective shares. In view of the above modification, the award passed by the Tribunal in MCOP.No.165 of 2019 stands modified. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous petition is closed." 4. Registry is directed to incorporate the above paragraph Nos. 1, 7, 8, 9 & 10 quoted above and issue fresh order copy to the parties forthwith. 5. In other respects, the order dated 25.06.2025 shall remain unaltered. 17.07.2025 rri T.V.THAMILSELVI, J. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis rri CMA NO. 1082 of 2024 and CMP.No.10032 of 2024 17.07.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis