1 2025:CGHC:9 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1178 of 2024 1 - Rajeev Agrawal S/o Late Rambihari Agrawal Aged About 45 Years R/o Shankar Ward, Bhatapara, Tehsil Bhatapara, Dist. Baloda, Bazar-Bhatpara, C.G., Taluka, Bhatapara, Dist. Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Ramkali Agrawal W/o Late Rambihari Agrawal Aged About 67 Years R/o Shankar Ward, Bhatapara, Dist. Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, C.G. 2 - Sanjay Bihari Agrawal S/o Late Rambihari Agrawal Aged About 50 Years R/o Shankar Ward, Bhatapara, Dist. Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, C.G. 3 - Pratibha Agrawal D/o Late Rambihari Agrawal, W/o Rajkumar Agrawal Aged About 46 Years R/o Near Rest House, Rajim, Dist. Gariyaband, C.G. 4 - Pratima Agrawal D/o Late Rambihari Agrawal, W/o Ajay Agrawal Aged About 45 Years R/o Annapurna Dairy, Baniyapara, Purani Basti, Raipur, Dist. Raipur, C.G. 5 - Sandeep Bihari Agrawal S/o Late Rambihari Agrawal Aged About 41 Years R/o Shankar Ward, Bhatapara, Dist. Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, C.G. 6 - Animesh Agrawal S/o Late Avadh Bihari Agrawal Aged About 49 Years R/o Ward No. 12, Shivaji Chowk, Bus Stand, Rajim, Dist. Gariyaband, C.G. 7 - Shyama Agrawal W/o Late Rajesh Agrawal Aged About 41 Years R/o Ward No. 12 Shivaji Chowk, Bus Stand, Rajim, Dist. Gariyaband, C.G. 8 - Minor Kumari Niharika D/o Late Rajesh Agrawal Aged About 14 Years Minor, Through Her Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Shyama Agrawal W/o Late Rajesh Agrawal, R/o Ward No. 12 Shivaji Chowk, Bus Stand, Rajim, Dist. Gariyaband, C.G. 9 - Minor Naman Agrawal S/o Late Rajesh Agrawal Aged About 5 Years Minor, Through His Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Shyama Agrawal W/o Late Rajesh Agrawal, R/o Ward No. 12 Shivaji Chowk, Bus Stand, Rajim, Dist. 2 Gariyaband, C.G. 10 - Chandralata Agrawal W/o Late Avadhbihari Agrawal Aged About 78 Years R/o Ward No. 12, Shivaji Chowk, Bus Stand Rajim, Dist. Gariyaband, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Arpan Verma, Advocate For Respondents No. 6 to 10 : Mr.Abhijeet Mishra, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 02/01/2025 1) At the very outset, Mr. Mishra submits that earlier, respondents No. 6 to 10 had filed counter-claim before the learned trial Court and later on, application for withdrawal of counter-claim has been moved which is pending consideration, therefore, present petition is not maintainable. 2) At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to revive if cause of action subsists. 3) Permission granted. 4) Consequently, instant writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Ajinkya