APHC010498852025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. YALAMANCHILI RAGHU RAM CHANDRA RAO, S/O. APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O, 72, CH. NAGAPURAM VILLAGE ( R ),CHIDIKADA, GOLUGONDAMANDAL,ANANKAPALLI DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 3. THE ASSISTAMT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, NARSIPATNAM, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY EECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, NARSIPATNAM, ANANKAPALLI DISTRICT. 5. CH NAGAPURAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP.BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, CH NAGAPURAM VILLAGE. HABITATION OF CHEEDIKADA GRAM PANCHAYATH, GOLUGONDA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, GOLUGONDA, GOLUGONDA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 26073/2025 YALAMANCHILI RAGHU RAM CHANDRA RAO, S/O. APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O, 72, CH. NAGAPURAM VILLAGE ( R ),CHIDIKADA, GOLUGONDAMANDAL,ANANKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. THE ASSISTAMT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, NARSIPATNAM, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. Y EECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, NARSIPATNAM, ANANKAPALLI DISTRICT. CH NAGAPURAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP.BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, CH NAGAPURAM VILLAGE. HABITATION OF CHEEDIKADA GRAM PANCHAYATH, GOLUGONDA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. THE TAHSILDAR, GOLUGONDA, GOLUGONDA MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI YALAMANCHILI RAGHU RAM CHANDRA RAO, S/O. APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O, 72, CH. NAGAPURAM VILLAGE ( R ),CHIDIKADA, GOLUGONDAMANDAL,ANANKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. THE ASSISTAMT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, Y EECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, NARSIPATNAM, ANANKAPALLI DISTRICT. CH NAGAPURAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP.BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, CH NAGAPURAM VILLAGE. HABITATION OF CHEEDIKADA GRAM PANCHAYATH, GOLUGONDA MANDAL, THE TAHSILDAR, GOLUGONDA, GOLUGONDA MANDAL, 7. SENAPATHI SATHIBABU, S/O. KONDAYYA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEAIRS, R/O, L-115,CH. NAGAPURAM VILLAGE ( R ),CHIDIKADA, GOLUGONDAMANDALJANANKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS by declaring the action of the respondents in not removing the unauthorized construction on a notified water body which is known as 'SirrapalliVaniCheruvu' or PaniCheruvu,' in an extent of Ac.3.61 cents situated in Sy No. 70 in the Ch. Nagapuram village, mandal district as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional. And consequently direct the respondents more particularly the respondent to remove the unauthorized construction on a notified water body which is known as 'SirrapalliVaniCheruvu' or 'PaniCheruvu,' in an extent of Ac.3.61 cents situated in Sy No. 70 in the Ch. Nagapuram village, GolugundaMandal, Anakapalli District. And to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct, the respondents not to make any further constructions in the on a notified water body which is known as “SirrapalliVaniCheruvu” or “PaniCheruvu,” in an extent of Ac.3.61 cents situated in Sy No. 70 in the Ch. Nagapuram village, GolugundaMandal, Anakapalli District. Pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to amend the affidavit para no:1 As “I submit that I am the Petitioner herein and I am Sarpanch of Ch. Nagapuram village, Golugonda Mandal, Anakapalli District and as such I am well acquainted with the facts of the case. INSTEAD OF “ I submit that I am the Petitioner herein and as such I am well acquainted with the facts of the case. ” in the above Writ Petition No. 26073 Of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NANILU NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra The Court made the following: ORDER The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent authorities are not removing unauthorized construction made by respondent no.7 on notified water body known as Sirrapallivani Cheruvu or Panicheruvu in an extent of Ac.3-61 cents situated in Survey No.70 of Ch.Nagapuram Village. 2. Despite giving sufficient time the authorities did neither get instructions nor file counter. 3. The relief sought is innocuous for removal of unauthorized constructions made by respondent no.7 on water body. As no order affecting interest of respondent no.7 is being passed, issuing notice and keeping the matter inviting his counter is unnecessary. 4. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the authorities to pass reasoned order on the representation made by the petitioner after verifying as to whether any unauthorized constructions are made on the notified water body, within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order and communicate the same to the petitioner. If any such constructions are found, the authorities shall take steps for removal, after putting the concerned on notice inviting explanation and affording opportunity of being heard. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of copy of the order. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATED 23rd day of December, 2025. RR