Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 46154 (BOM)
SHRI RAMCHANDRA SUDHAKAR S/O NAMDEO MOTGHARE v. RAJESH S/O SHYAMSUNDER JAISWAL
SA/173/2022 · 2025-01-09
Shri Anil L Pansare
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46154 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46154 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 sa 173.22.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR. Second Appeal No. 173 of 2022 [Shri Ramchandra @ Sudhakar S/o Namdeo Motghare ..vs.. Rajesh S/o Shyamsunder Jaiswal] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. S. G. Karmarkar, Advocate for the respondent CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE J.
DATED : 09-01-2025 On 12-12-2024, following order was passed.
“None present for the appellant.
2. The order dated 11/09/2023 shows that earlier also this appeal was dismissed for default. Subsequently, it came to be restored. Again there is absence of the appellant or his Counsel.
3. The appeal be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on 09/01/2025.”
2. None appears for the appellant.
3. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed under Order XLI Rule 17 read with Order XLII Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. (Anil L. Pansare, J.) wasnik 2025:BHC-NAG:220