Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46152 (ORI)

ANUP KUMAR SINHA v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/19362/2025 · 2025-07-25

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.19362 of 2025 Anup Kumar Sinha … Petitioner Mr. S.K. Das, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Others … Opp. Parties Mr. M.R. Mohanty, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 25.07.2025 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for appearing for the Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed, inter alia, with the following prayer:- “Under the above circumstances, it is therefore humbly prayed that the Hon'ble Court be graciously pleased to direct the 0pp. Party No.l and 2 to grant the benefit of UGC scale of pay in favour of the petitioner from 01.01.1986 and the revisions thereof so also the revision of pension and to pay the differential arrears to the petitioner and to grant him all consequential service and financial benefit within a stipulated period as deem fit and proper; And/or pass any other writ/writs, order/orders/direction/directions in the fitness of the case. And for this act of kindness as in duty bound the petitioner shall ever pray.” 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-3 and the same may be directed to be considered p. 2 within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-3 within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order with due communication to the petitioner. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge amit