Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46143 (MAD)

S.RAMADOSS v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

WP/16278/2025 · 2025-06-02

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.16278 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.P.No.16278 of 2025 S.Ramadoss ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., No.3/137, Salamedu, Kandamanadi P.O, Villupuram – 605 401. 2. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., Cuddalore Region, No-2, Imperial Road, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District – 607 002. 3. The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees, Pension Fund Trust, No.2, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.02.2025 and to direct the respondents to pay interest 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.16278 of 2025 of 12% P.A for delay of 636 days till the date of order in releasing the petitioner's pension amount and to calculate correct D.A and to give the petitioner's EL benefits difference amount. For Petitioner : Ms.M.Mullaipoovizhi For Respondents : Ms.S.Pavithra, Standing Counsel ***** O R D E R The instant writ petition has been filed with a prayer for issuing a Mandamus, to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.02.2025 and to direct the respondents to pay interest of 12% P.A for delay of 636 days till the date of order in releasing the petitioner's pension amount and to calculate correct D.A and to give the petitioner's EL benefits difference amount. 2. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that when the petitioner, who had retired from the services of the first respondent on 30.04.2023 as Special Conductor, made a representation dated 19.02.2025 to the respondents seeking interest for the belated payment of the terminal benefits, there was no response for the same. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.16278 of 2025 3. Heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused the materials available on record. 4. Though there is disputed facts between the parties, taking into consideration of the fact that the representation made by the petitioner is yet to be considered, this Court without going into merits of the matter, deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 19.02.2025 on it's own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. In the result, this Writ Petition is disposed of with the above observations. No costs. 02.06.2025 kv Index : Yes/No Speaking order /Non Speaking Order Neutral Citation : Yes/No 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.16278 of 2025 To 1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., No.3/137, Salamedu, Kandamanadi P.O, Villupuram – 605 401. 2. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., Cuddalore Region, No-2, Imperial Road, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District – 607 002. 3. The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees, Pension Fund Trust, No.2, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.16278 of 2025 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. kv W.P.No.16278 of 2025 02.06.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis