RICHHPAL SINGH S/O LATE JAGAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRES/426/2024 · 2025-10-27
Suresh Chand Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46140 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46140 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43073] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 426/2024 In S.B. Civil First Appeal No.63/2022
1. Richhpal Singh S/o Late Jagan Singh, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Laxman Singh Son Of Late Jagan Singh R/o Ward No. 30, Sikar, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.)
2. Moti Singh S/o Late Jagan Singh, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Laxman Singh Son Of Late Jagan Singh R/o Ward No. 30, Sikar, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.)
3. Ashok Kumar S/o Late Jagan Singh, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Laxman Singh Son Of Late Jagan Singh R/o Ward No. 30, Sikar, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.)
4. Brij Mohan S/o Late Jagan Singh, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Laxman Singh Son Of Late Jagan Singh R/o Ward No. 30, Sikar, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.)
5. Ram Kumar S/o Late Jagan Singh, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Laxman Singh Son Of Late Jagan Singh R/o Ward No. 30, Sikar, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.)
6. Rajendra S/o Late Jagan Singh, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Laxman Singh Son Of Late Jagan Singh R/o Ward No. 30, Sikar, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.)
7. Kesar W/o Late Jagan Singh, Through Power Of Attorney Holder Laxman Singh Son Of Late Jagan Singh R/o Ward No. 30, Sikar, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.)
8. Laxman Singh S/o Late Jagan Singh, R/o Ward No. 30, Sikar, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector, Sikar
2. Superintendent Of Police, Sikar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vidhut Kumar Gupta For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 27/10/2025
1. Instant Civil Misc. Restoration Application has been filed seeking to restore the S.B. Civil First Appeal No.63/2022, which
[2025:RJ-JP:43073] (2 of 2) [CRES-426/2024] was filed by the plaintiffs against dismissal of their Civil Suit for possession, vide judgment dated 23.11.2021.
2. The First appeal was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 05.10.2023 due to non-removal of defects pointed out by office.
3. The restoration application has been filed within time.
4. Counsel for applicants-appellants undertakes to cure the defect(s) pointed out by the office, soon after restoration of the first appeal.
5. In view of above, the civil misc. restoration application is allowed and S.B. Civil First Appeal No.63/2022 is directed to be restored to its original number.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/10