Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4614 (UTT)

GOVIND SINGH RAWAT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/604/2022 · 2025-08-08

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6965 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.604 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. B.M. Pingal, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. None present for respondent No.3. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after investigation, the final report has been filed in favour of the petitioner. 5. The said fact is not disputed by the learned State Counsel, however, he elaborated on instruction that after investigation, no evidence has been found against the petitioner and his name was dropped out from the alleged offence while charge-sheet has been submitted against two other persons namely Balram Singh and Pooja Rana. The said instruction has been passed on to this Court by the learned State Counsel, which is taken on record. 6. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, nothing survives in the present criminal writ petition and the same is hereby closed. 7. Interim order dated 18.04.2022 stands vacated. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 08.08.2025 PN PREETI NEGI Digitally signed by PREETI NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=63c75a8c4765581180a58d7478fadbe38331bac55c78b 5f9f0276c16432f6aab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2BA53171893B3C3CB3CCCAE81FAE064498483A8 3D84BDB0F9229D5BF08D959AC, cn=PREETI NEGI Date: 2025.08.08 13:22:53 +05'30'