Mrs. Pallati Veeraraghuvulu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/12047/2025 · 2025-05-05
Challa Gunaranjan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46138 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46138 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 12047 OF 2025 Between: Mrs. Pallati Veeraraghuvulu, W/o.B.Jayaraju, aged about 60 years, Occ Part-time Instructor, R/o.H.No.4-35, S.C.Peta, Nallipudi, Near Post Office, Gangavaram, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Education Department of School Education, Secretariat, Amaravathi, Andhra Pradesh. The Commissioner of School Education Andhra Pradesh, 0/o.D.No.398/3, Vidya Bhavan, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. The Director of School education, Andhra Pradesh, 0/o.D.No.398/3 , Vidya Bhavan, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. The State Project Director, Andhra Pradesh Samagra Shiksha Office, KBC Zilla Parishad High School Premises, High School Road, Patamata, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh. Z.P.P High Scholl, rep. by its Head Master, Mallavaram, Gokavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, A.P
2. 3. 4. 5. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issuance of an appropriate Writ, Order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the Respondents authorities in trying to prevent the petitioner to be in service upto age of 62 in 5"^ Respondent, thought the petitioner is entitled to be service upto 62 years i.e., till 30.04.2027 thereby considering the
^ amendment made vide G.O.Ms.No.15 Finance (HR-IV-FR Department dated 31.01.2022 without considering 19.04.2025, illegal. Discriminative, arbitrary and contrary to the principles of natural justice, without any jurisdiction, violative of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India consequently direct respondents to continue petitioner service till the age of 62 years. and LR) representation dated and lA NO:
1 OF 2025 Petition under .Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the service of the petitioner upto age of 62 years, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVAS BASAVA Counsel for the Respondents 1, 3 & 5: GP FOR SERVICES -1 Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SMT R. SUDHA RANI, SC for APSS The Court made the following order:
APHC010230412025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 12047/2025 Between: Mrs. Pallati Veeraraghuvulu ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRI NIVAS BASAVA Counsel for the Respondent{S):
1.GP FOR SERVICES II
2 HCGR,J 0^ W.P.No.l2047of2025 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief/s:-
“...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the Respondents authorities in trying to prevent the petitioner to be in service upto age of 62 in 5**^ Respondent, though the petitioner is entitled to be service upto 62 years i.e., till 30.04.2027, thereby considering the amendment made vide G.O.Ms.No.15 Finance (HR-IV-FR and LR) Department dated 31.01.2022 without considering representation dated 19.04.2025, illegal, discriminative, arbitrary and contrary to the principles of natural justice, without any jurisdiction, violative of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct respondents to continue petitioner service till the age of 62 years and pass such other order or orders....” Heard Sri Srinivas Basava, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 and Smt R.Sudha Rani, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.4. more
2. Petitioner has been appointed on 09.10.2012 as a Part Time Instructor in the Office of Project Officer Rajiv Vidya Mission (SSA) at Vemulova, East Godavari District, on contract basis for initial period of eleven months.
She has been continued from time to time and her contractual tenure, as per the latest renewal, came to end on
30.04.2025. Petitioner has made representation dated 19.04.2025 to respondent Nos.2 to 4 requesting to consider the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.15, Finance (HR.IV-FR&LR) Department, dated 31.01.2022, by which the Government has extended the age of superannuation from sixty to sixty two years for the Government employees, which is stated to be pending. 3. r 3 HCGRJ W.P.No.l20a7 of 2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would suffice to direct respondent Nos.2 to 4 to consider and pass appropriate orders on aforesaid representation.
4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.4 has placed on record written instructions dated 27.09.2022, stating that petitioner has been engaged on contractual basis and that the period of tenure, as per the contract, got expired and petitioner has been disengaged. At any rate, as petitioner’s representation is pending with respondents, the same will be considered in accordance with law.
5.
6. In view of aforesaid
submissions, without expressing any opinion the merits of the matter, with the consent of both the learned counsel the present Writ Petition is
disposed of, directing respondent Nos.4 and 5 to consider and pass appropriate orders on petitioner;!.^representation dated 19.04.2025, in accordance with law, within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTYi5^EGlSTRAR rToFFlCER
1. The Principal Secretary, Education Department of School Education, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Amaravathi, Andhra Pradesh.
2. The Commissioner of School Education Andhra Pradesh, O/o.D.No.398/3, Vidya Bhavan, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
3. The Director of School Education, Andhra Pradesh, O/o.D.No.398/3, Vidya Bhavan, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
4. The State Project Director, Andhra Pradesh Samagra Shiksha Office, KBC Zilla Parishad High School Premises, High School Road, Patamata, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh.
5. The Head Master, Z.P.P High Scholl, Mallavaram, Gokavaram Mandal East Godavari District, A.P.
6. One CO to Sri Srinivas Basava, Advocate [OPUC]
7. One CC to Sri R. Sudha Rani, SC for APSS [OPUC]
8. Two CCs to GP for Services - II, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
9. Two CD Copies //TRUE COPY// To SEi RAM
HIGH COURT DATED:06/05/2025 3« MAY 2025 \ Uoieiii odcuon V
ORDER WP.No.12047 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS