[2025:RJ-JP:50928] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7098/2025 1. Ashok Sain Son Of Chhotulal Sain, Resident Of Jamaat Kasba, Lalsot, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 2. Santosh Sain Son Of Chhotulal Sain, Resident Of Jamaat Kasba, Lalsot, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 3. Umesh Sain S/o Santosh Sain, Resident Of Jamaat Kasba, Lalsot, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 4. Piru @ Rajesh Sain S/o Ashok Kumar Sain, Resident Of Jamaat Kasba, Lalsot, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Lal Bahadur Son Of Kaluram Meena, Resident Of Village Dholawas, Tehsil Rahuvas, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. N. S. Dhakar, Public Prosecutor. Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, Public Prosecutor. Mr. Sunil Kumar Chechi, Adv. with Mr. Hemant Kumar, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 17/12/2025 1. By way of this criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.417/2025 registered at Police Station Lalsot, District Dausa for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023 and Sections 3(1)(R), 3(1) (S), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act. [2025:RJ-JP:50928] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-7098/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the accused—petitioners submits that parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been filed along with this petition. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor places verification report dated 13.12.2025 received from Deputy Superintendent of Police, Circle —Lalsot, District Dausa. According to which, parties have entered into compromise. The said report is taken on record. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No.417/2025 registered at Police Station Lalsot, District Dausa, is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. [2025:RJ-JP:50928] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-7098/2025] 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J Tushar/47