Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46133 (KAR)

N.NAGENDRAPPA v. SMT.RATHNAMMA

CRP/866/2025 · 2025-11-25

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48853 CRP No. 866 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 866 OF 2025 (IO) BETWEEN: N.NAGENDRAPPA S/O LATE HANCHINAMANE NAGESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O ANABERU VILLAGE-577002, DAVANEGRE-TQ AND DIST, …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HALLI SHANTAPPA BASAPPA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT.RATHNAMMA W/O LATE N.REVANAPPA HANCHINAMANE, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 2. SRINIVAS, S/O LATE N.REVANAPPA HANCHINAMANE, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R1 AND R2 ARE R/O ANABERU VILLAGE, DAVANEGRE-TQ AND DIST-577002, 3. SMT JAYASHREE, W/O SIDDESH.H, D/O LATE N.REVANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O POLICE QUATRES, HARIHAR, -577601 4. SMT KAVITHA, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48853 CRP No. 866 of 2025 W/O SOPPANERA GURU.P.N, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O KUNDUR VILLAGE, HONNALI-TQ-577002, DAVANAGERE-DISTRICT, …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 9.09.2025 PASSED ON IA NO.1 IN OS NO.15/2024 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DAVANAGERE., ALLOWING THE IA NO.I FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(d) R/W SEC.151 OF CPC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 25.11.2025 seeking to withdraw the revision petition, which reads as under: "It is respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above petition with reserving liberty to file R.A. before the jurisdictional court in the interest of justice and equity." 2. The memo is taken on record. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48853 CRP No. 866 of 2025 3. In view of the said memo, the civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn as it is not maintainable with liberty to file necessary appeal. The time spent before this Court in this revision shall be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21