APHC010573282017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 32762/2017 Between: 1. SIMHADRI, S/O BABU RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICTT 2. S.RAGHURAM PRASAD,, S/O NARASIMHA RAO, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC:ADVOCATE, R/O AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. PRL SECY HOME DEPT HYD 3 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA AT MACHILIPATNAM. 3. NAGAYALANKA POLICE STATION, REP. BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NAGAYALANKA POLICE STATION, NAGAYALANKA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. AMMULA GOVARDHANA RAO, S/O LATE RANGADASU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O NANGEGADDA VILLAGE, NAGAYALANKA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order of: direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondent Nos.2 and 3 and their 2 police personnel not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitiOner N0.1 and the respondent No.4 declaring their action as illegal and ultra vires to Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, besides directing not to proceed further and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 40731 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos.2 and 3 and their police personnel not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioner No.1 and the respondent No.4, pending final disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V S R ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR HOME (TG) 3. RAMA RAO MAVIDI The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Writ Petition No.32762 of 2017 O R D E R: Sri P. Gagan Karthik, learned counsel, representing on behalf of Sri V.S.R. Anjaneyulu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of the writ petition, both parties settled the matter amicably outside the Court and as such no further adjudication is required in the present writ petition. 2) The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is placed on record. 3) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4) There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Dt.26.09.2025 PGR 4 (598) THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.No.32762 of 2017 Dt.26.09.2025 PGR