DESIGN TECH STRUCTURAL CONSULTANT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPMB/92/2024 · 2025-07-01
Alok Mahra, G Narendar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4613 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4613 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:5557-DB HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA 01ST JULY, 2025 WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 92 OF 2024 Design Tech Structural Consultant …...Petitioner. Versus State of Uttarakhand & others …….Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. Abhilasha Tomar, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari,
learned counsel. Counsel for the State : Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel.
JUDGMENT :(per Mr. G. Narendar, C.J.)
Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State submits that the State desires to withdraw the impugned tender, and after amending the conditions, re- issue the same.
2.
Submission of learned State Counsel is placed on record.
3.
Liberty is granted to the respondent- State to withdraw the impugned tender and re-issue the same after carrying out such necessary amendments/ alterations or deletion.
4.
In that view, the writ petition is rendered infructuous.
5.
The writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 1
2025:UHC:5557-DB
6.
There shall be no order as to costs.
7.
Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
________________ G. NARENDAR, C.J.
_____________ ALOK MAHRA, J. Dt: 01st July, 2025 NISHANT 2 NISHANT KUMAR Digitally signed by NISHANT KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=ad3fcb5ca64340f5dd0a4c574afa0fd63133605c a57cdc00ec2b7462b452b326, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=7E81318F3B1BE7EAAC9370185F7C9C208 92BC63A055CFD1961690560487E670C, cn=NISHANT KUMAR Date: 2025.07.04 11:58:15 +05'30'