Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46129 (AP)

D. Narasimha Rao, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/1826/2013 · 2025-02-19

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 1826 OF 2013 Between: D. Narasimha Rao, s/o. Surya Rao, aged 50 years, Junior Assistant, West Godavari District Coop. Marketing Society Limited, Jangareddigudem Branch, West Godavari District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Department of dooperation. Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The West Godavari District Coop. Marketing Society Ltd., Eluru, West dodavari District, rep. by its Deputy Registrar/ Business Manager. 3. Sri M. Venkateswara Rao, s/o. China Bheemaiah, aged 46 years. West Godavari District Coop. Marketing Society Ltd., Near Fire Station, Eluru vyest Godavari District. ...RESPONDENTS F[etition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly a WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents in applying the Amended Bye-Law No.IV (3) to the petitioner's case for promotion to the post of Senior Assistant from the post of Junior Assistant and promotilig the 3 rd respondent as Senior Assistant as arbitrary, illegal, biased, unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Senior Assistant as per Bye-Law No.IV (3) existing as on the date of his appointment. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2013rWPMP. NO: 2210 OF 2013^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case oldie petitioner for promotion to the post of Senior Assistant as per Bye-Law No.IV (3) existing as on the date of his appointment by reversing the promotion of the 3rd respondent, forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. D. LALITHA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SMT.BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI L.V.S.NAGARAJU The Court made the following: ORDER APHcbl 0207532013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 1826/2013 Between: D. Narasimha Rao ...PETITIONER AND Government Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: I.DI^LITHA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. BdBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI 2.LVSNAGARAJU 3.GP FOR COOPERATION The Coprt made the following: ...RESPONDENT(S) 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no further orders are required in this writ petition, j 2. Recording the same, the writ petition is closed. No costs. 3. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ ;}etition shall stand closed. Sd/- P.U.V.BHASKAR RAO ASSISTANT registrar SECTION OFFICER I //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Smt. D.Lalitha Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Cooperation, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. One CC to Smt. bobba vijayalakshmi. Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri L.V.S.Nagaraju, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Three CD Copies. Gl (gsg) HIGH COURT 91 DATED:20/02/2025 ORDER WP.No.1826 of 2013 <'? 2 2 SEP 2025 i ^ Current Section ★ CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS