Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46128 (ALL)

RAMSHREE AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U P AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/15767/2019 · 2025-10-07

Vikas Budhwar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15767 of 2019 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Rahul Malviya, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 2. The case of the writ petitioners is that they are working as Class-IV employee as Malli on daily wage basis since 2014 and 2010 respectively. The grievance of the writ petitioners is that the writ petitioners are not being paid the pay-scale as sanctioned to Class-IV employees being the Minimum Pay-Scale which has been accorded to Dinesh Kumar and others working in Government Garden Lalitpur. 3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondent no. 3 to consider the claim of the writ petitioners. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits has no objection and he gracefully accepts the same. 6. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed off granting liberty to the writ petitioners to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self- attested copy of the writ petition before the third respondent, District Horticulture Officer Barua Sagar, District Jhansi, who shall on the receipt of the same by 17.10.2025, proceed to decide the claim of the petitioners strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order. In case the third respondent is of the opinion that the matter is to be decided by some other authorities then the papers shall be transmitted to the same. 7. Needless to point out that the writ petition has been decided without Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amrendra Pratap Singh, Ramesh Kumar, Vinod Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ramshree And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U P And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) seeking any response from the respondents. Thus, passing of this order may not be construed to an expression that this Court has gone into the merits of the case. 8. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. October 8, 2025 A. Prajapati WRIA No. 15767 of 2019 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad