APHC010515362015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7274/2015 Between: 1. M/S LLOYDS SERVICES STATION,, NO.40-13-1/2, RING ROAD, CHANDRAMOULIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-520 010, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P., REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER K.SIVARAMA KRISHNA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. INDIAN OIL COPROPRATION LTD, GVR Towers, Bharathinagar, Ring Road, Vijayawada, 520010, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Chief Divisional Retail Sales Manager. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent in not renewing the petitioner's dealership agreement for another 5 years without assigning any reason and clarifying about the further requirements and also abrupt stoppage of petroleum supplies after 2 1/2 years from the due date as arbitrary, illegal and unjustified and consequently direct the respondent to renew the petitioner's dealership agreement for another period of 5 years in the interest of justice and to pass 2 JS,J W.P.No.7274/2015 IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 9677 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent restore the supplies of petroleum products to the petitioner forthwith in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GUDURI VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. SAI SANJAY SURANENI 3 JS,J W.P.No.7274/2015 The Court made the following ORDER: Ms. Kusuma Kumari, learned counsel, representing Sri G. Venkateswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 12.11.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.7274/2015 253 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7274/2015 Dated: 12.11.2025 KAS