- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48721 WP No. 8778 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 8778 OF 2025 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: SAI SECURITY AND DETECTIVE SERVICES SHALIMAR COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR, SHOP. NO.7, KANKANADY. MANGALORE-575 002. REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SAI.S K PUNJA …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND CHAIRMAN, PILIKULA DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY, PILIKULA, MUDUSHEDDE, MANGALORE - 575 002. 3. THE COMMISSIONER PILIKULA DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY, PILIKULA, MUDUSHEDDE, MANGALORE - 575 002. 4. FALCON SECURITY CONSULTANT KAIRANNA BUILDING, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48721 WP No. 8778 of 2025 2ND FLOOR, JYOTHI CIRCLE, BALMATTA, MANGALORE-575 002 REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, RAMACHANDRA PUTTUR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDARTH BABU RAO., AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. RAJESWARA P.N., ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMMUNICATION DATED 17-03-2025 IN REJECTING BID OF THE PETITIONER RECEIVED THROUGH MAIL VIDE ANNEXURE-A, THEREBY AWARDING THE WORK ORDER IN FAVOR OF PETITIONER VIDE TENDER DATED 24-12-2024 BEARING.NO.PDA(1)CR.34/TENDER-SECURITY/2024-25 VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court, seeking the following relief: "Issue Writ, writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the communication dated 17-03-2025 in rejecting bid of the petitioner received through mail vide annexure-A, thereby awarding the work order in favor of petitioner vide tender dated 24-12-2024 bearing No. PDA(1)CR.34/TENDER-SECURITY/2024-25 vide Annexure-B". - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48721 WP No. 8778 of 2025 2. Memo dated 06.11.2025 has been filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, which reads as under: "Undersigned petitioner is not willing to prosecute the Writ Petition and he is willing to withdraw the above Writ Petition. Hence, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition in the interest of justice and equity." 3. Accepting the said memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending I.As stand disposed of. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SBN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 117