Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46112 (AP)

BOTTA JANARDHANA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/8046/2020 · 2025-09-15

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010133512020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 8046/2020 Between: 1. BOTTA JANARDHANA RAO, S/O. LATE B.KRISHNA, AGED 70 YRS, R/O D.NO.14-1-10, NOWROJU RAOD, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. BOTTA NARASIMHA MURTHY,, S/O. LATE B.KRISHNA, AGED 68 YRS, R/O D.NO.14-1-10, NOWROJU RAOD, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. BOTTA CHANDRA SEKAR, , S/O. LATE B.KRISHNA, AGED 65 YRS, R/O D.NO.14-1-10, NOWROJU RAOD, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. PALLA LEELA KUMARI,, D/O. LATE B.KRISHNA, AGED 58 YRS, R/O D.NO.14-1-10, NOWROJU RAOD, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT . 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR CUM SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND POOLING, BHEEMUNIPATNAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2 4. THE TAHSILDAR, BHEEMUNIPATNAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GANGISETTY RAVEENA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: 3 Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondent Nos.3 and 4 in trying to dispossess the petitioners from their land in an extent of Ac.5.00 cents in Sy.No.101/1, in Annavaram Village, Bheemunipatnam Village, Visakhapatnam District, without issuing any notice and without following the procedure contemplated under law. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the respondents would follow the due procedure with respect to the subject land, if so warranted. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject property in an extent of Ac.5.00 cents in Sy.No.101/1, in Annavaram Village, Bheemunipatnam Village, Visakhapatnam District, strictly in accordance with law and if the petitioners are otherwise found to be in possession of the same, they shall not be dispossessed except by following the due process of law. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order, if any, is deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 16.09.2025 PNS