APHC010310152007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. DR. B. SREEKANTH, ANANTHAPUR DIST., S/O. B.P.RANASWAMY, R/O. SRIRANGA NILAYAM, MUCHUKOTA (V&P), PEDDAPAPPURU MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 1. SRI KRISHNADEVARAYA UIVERSITY AND ANOTHER, ANANTAPUR, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, ANANTAPUR, 2. THE STATEOF A P DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDEUCATION, REP.BYITS SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, HYD. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed pleased topass orders particularly one in thenatureof mandmaus declaring the actionof the 1st respondent University in not following the rule of reservation and observing the recrutment procedure prescribed by the 2bnd res as arbitrary, illegal, violativeof Rule 22 of the A.P. STate and Subordinate Service Rules and G.O.Ms.No.94 GAD, dt.28.3.2003 and Art. 14 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and grant such other relief as may be deemed just andprope IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 18003 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 14329/2007 DR. B. SREEKANTH, ANANTHAPUR DIST., S/O. B.P.RANASWAMY, R/O. SRIRANGA NILAYAM, MUCHUKOTA (V&P), PEDDAPAPPURU MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND SRI KRISHNADEVARAYA UIVERSITY AND ANOTHER, ANANTAPUR, REGISTRAR, ANANTAPUR, THE STATEOF A P DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDEUCATION, REP.BYITS SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, HYD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topass orders particularly one in thenatureof mandmaus declaring the actionof the 1st respondent University in not following the rule of reservation and observing the recrutment procedure prescribed by the 2bnd res as arbitrary, illegal, violativeof Rule 22 of the A.P. STate and Subordinate Service Rules and G.O.Ms.No.94 GAD, dt.28.3.2003 and Art. 14 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and grant such other relief as may be deemed just andproper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 18003 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DR. B. SREEKANTH, ANANTHAPUR DIST., S/O. B.P.RANASWAMY, R/O. SRIRANGA NILAYAM, MUCHUKOTA (V&P), PEDDAPAPPURU ...PETITIONER SRI KRISHNADEVARAYA UIVERSITY AND ANOTHER, ANANTAPUR, THE STATEOF A P DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDEUCATION, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the therewith, the High Court may be pleased topass orders particularly one in thenatureof mandmaus declaring the actionof the 1st respondent University in not following the rule of reservation and observing the recrutment procedure prescribed by the 2bnd respondent as arbitrary, illegal, violativeof Rule 22 of the A.P. STate and Subordinate Service Rules and G.O.Ms.No.94 GAD, dt.28.3.2003 and Art. 14 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and grant such other relief as r in the circumstances of the case. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 1st respondent to conduct recruitment for filling the posts of teaching Assts in terms of its resolution dt. 29.8.2000 and G.O.Ms.No.94 G.A.D. dt. 28.3.2003 pendign disposalof the above W.P., and grant such other relief as may be deemed just and necessary in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. O UDAYA KUMAR SC For S K UNIVERSITY 2. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER Sri Cheemakurthi Narendra, learned counsel, representing Sri Kasa Jaganmohan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that cause in this writ petition does not survive and this writ petition has become infrcutuous. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR