1 2025:CGHC:1876-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 136 of 2025 M/s. Rakesh Kumar Jain Having Registered OfÏce At 267/34, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Square, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, Represented Through Its Partner- Shri Rakesh Kumar Jain, S/o Shri Bhagchand Jain, Aged About 61 Years, Having OfÏce at 'renuka', 33/17, Main Road, Tikrapara, Opposite Dr. Ghosh Nursing Home, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s) versus 1. Union of India Through General Manager, South East Central Railways, OfÏce of General Manager, South East Central Railways, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Chief Project Manager Gati Shakti Bilaspur, Having OfÏce At South East Central Railways, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ...Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Deputy Solicitor General. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.01.13 18:01:07 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 13 .0 1 .202 5 1. Heard Mr. Abhishek Vinod Deshmukh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Ramakant Mishra, learned Deputy Solicitor General, appearing for the respondents. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “1. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions quashing the bid rejection by which the Techno-commercial bid of the petitioner was rejected and the respondent authorities may be directed to reconsider the entire matter; 2. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions declaring that the petitioner fulfills all the eligibility criteria as required by the respondent in the Tender Document; 3. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions directing the respondent authorities to consider the price bid of the petitioner; 3 4. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s), which is deemed fit and proper in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has moved an I.A. No. 2 of 2025, which is an application for withdrawal of the petition. 4. Learned Deputy Solicitor General, appearing for the respondents, has no objection. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, I.A. No. 2 of 2025 is allowed and the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan