Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 461 (UTT)

KHURSHEED AHMED v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPPIL/17/2026 · 2026-02-16

Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Dat e Of f ice Not es, r ep or t s, or d er s or p r oceed in g s or d ir ect ion s an d Reg ist r ar ’s or d er w it h Sig n at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 1 5 .0 4 .2 02 6 W PPI L No. 3 1 of 2 0 26 Anoop Nautiyal ------Petitioner. Ver su s State of Uttarakhand and others -Respondents With WPPIL No. 150 of 2025 WPPIL No. 17 of 2026 Hon 'ble Man oj Ku m ar Gu pt a, C.J. Hon ’ble Su bh ash Upadh yay , J. 1. Ms. Tanupriya Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner in WPPIL Nos. 31 of 2026 and 150 of 2025. 2. Sri Shashank Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner in WPPIL No. 17 of 2026. 3. Sri Rahul Verma, learned Additional Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. 4. Sri Manoj Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the Union of India. 5. Sri Rahul Consul, learned counsel for respondent No. 4 in WPPIL NO. 17 of 2026. 6. Ms. Khushboo Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent No. 3 in WPPIL No. 150 of 2025. 7. The issue raised is already under consideration in WPPIL No. 150 of 2025. 8. List the present writ petition, along with WPPIL No. 150 of 2025, after four weeks. ( Su bh ash Upad h y ay , J.) ( Man oj Ku m ar Gu pt a, C.J.) 15.04.2026 15.04.2026 Rathour