MOKBUL HUSSAIN SHEIKH v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS
MC(WPC)/27/2025 · 2025-02-26
W Diengdoh
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 461 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 461 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
Serial No. 04 Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
MC[WP(C)] No. 27 of 2025 in WP(C) No. 468 of 2018
Date of Decision: 26.02.2025 Shri. Mokbul Hussain Sheikh son of Kanu Sheikh, resident of Magurmari, P.O Haripur, Police Station Phulbari, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
……Petitioner
- Vs-
1. State of Meghalaya represented by the
Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya,
Education Department, Meghalaya.
2. The Director of School Education & Literacy,
Meghalaya, Shillong.
3. The District School Education Officer, West
Garo Hills, Tura, Meghalaya.
4. The Principal, Garodubi Higher Secondary
School, P.O Haripur, West Garo Hills District,
Meghalaya.
5. The Secretary, Managing Committee, Garodubi Higher Secondary School, P.O Haripur, P.S Phulbari, West Garo Hills District,
Meghalaya.
6. Shri. Aziar Rahman, Assistant Teacher 2025:MLHC:114
2
C/o Garodubi Higher Secondary School, P.O
Haripur, P.S Phulbari, West Garo Hills
District, Meghalaya.
……..Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. S.A. Sheikh, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. N.D. Chullai, AAG with
Mr. H. Abraham, GA.
Ms. Z.E. Nongkynrih, GA. for R 1-3.
Ms. M. Hajong, Adv. vice
Mr. H.L. Shangreiso, Sr. Adv. for R 4 & 5.
Mr. R. Debnath, Adv. for R 6.
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press:
Yes/No
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Mr. S.A. Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that on prayer made and on being directed by this Court, another respondent has been impleaded in these proceedings. However, since the petitioner would seek specific relief against the newly impleaded respondent, therefore, the petition has to be suitably amended to incorporate such prayer. To this extent, prayer is made for amendment of the writ petition.
2. This Court on consideration of the submission made, is in 2025:MLHC:114
3
agreement with the learned counsel for the petitioner and therefore, will allow the prayer made so as to enable the petitioner to amend the instant writ petition.
3. Accordingly, this Misc. Case is disposed of.
Judge
2025:MLHC:114 Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2025.02.26 19:47:44 IST