Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46096 (RAJ)

SUMAN MALAWAT W/O LT. SHRI RAKESH SANSI, PRESENT HUSBAND DEEPAK SANSI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/11413/2025 · 2025-11-26

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47903] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11413/2025 Suman Malawat W/o Lt. Shri Rakesh Sansi, Present Husband Deepak Sansi, Aged About 40 Years, R/o House No. 93/19, A Futa Court, Old Bypass Road, Purani Basti, Police Station Nahargadh Road, Jaipur North (Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 26/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 150/2025 registered at Police Station Nahargadh District Jaipur City North for the offence(s) under Sections 19/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950. 2. Heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and the opposition raised by the learned Public Prosecutor. 3. On perusal of antecedents which are brought to the knowledge of this Court, by the learned Public Prosecutor which is reproduced as under: dz-la- izdj.k la[;k /kkjk iqfyl Fkkuk urhtk U;k;ky; 1. 43@06 19@54 vkcdkjh Ukkgjx< jksM] ltk 200@ : [2025:RJ-JP:47903] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11413/2025] vf/kfu;e t;iqj mRrj fnukad 11-09-06 2. 58@06 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e Ukkgjx< jksM] t;iqj mRrj ltk 200@ : fnukad 20-02-07 3. 97@06 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e Ukkgjx< jksM] t;iqj mRrj ltk 1200@ : fnukad 07-11-09 4. 131@06 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e Ukkgjx< jksM] t;iqj mRrj ltk 1500@ : fnukad 24-02-09 5. 136@06 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e Ukkgjx< jksM] t;iqj mRrj ltk 1000@ : fnukad 07-02-09 6. 178@06 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e Ukkgjx< jksM] t;iqj mRrj ltk 200@ : fnukad 19-04-07 7. 72@08 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e Ukkgjx< jksM] t;iqj mRrj iSaf.Max dksVZ 8. 149@08 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e Ukkgjx< jksM] t;iqj mRrj nks’keqDr 9. 88@09 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e Ukkgjx< jksM] t;iqj mRrj iSaf.Max dksVZ 10. 26@11 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e Ukkgjx< jksM] t;iqj mRrj 11 ekg dk lk/kkj.k dkjkokl o 1000@: tqekZuk fnukad 22-12- 11 11. 297@14 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e Ukkgjx< jksM] t;iqj mRrj 4 ihvks dk ykHk o 5 ihvks ds rgr 600@: vfHk;kstu O;; ds tek 12. 77@17 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e Ukkgjx< jksM] t;iqj mRrj iSaf.Max dksVZ 13. 22@19 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e Ukkgjx< jksM] t;iqj mRrj iSaf.Max dksVZ 14. 69@20 323] 341] 34 Hkk- na- la- Ukkgjx< jksM] t;iqj mRrj iSaf.Max dksVZ 15. 28@21 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e Ukkgjx< jksM] t;iqj mRrj iSaf.Max dksVZ 16. 201@21 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e Ukkgjx< jksM] t;iqj mRrj iSaf.Max dksVZ 17. 82@22 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e Ukkgjx< jksM] t;iqj mRrj iSaf.Max dksVZ 18. 10@24 19@54 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e Ukkgjx< jksM] t;iqj mRrj iSaf.Max dksVZ 19. 14@25 8@20 ,uMhih,l , DV Ukkgjx< jksM] t;iqj mRrj --------- [2025:RJ-JP:47903] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11413/2025] This Court is not convinced by the arguments of counsel for the applicant that applicant is a widow lady aged 40 years, and it is prima facie opined that the applicant if enlarged on bail, might be a threat to the society, as grave violation of the State Excise Laws has been done by her often. 4. Considering the overall facts and considering that applicant is a threat to society; that there have been several criminal antecedents registered against the applicant, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 5. Accordingly, the present bail application is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/25