Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46096 (CHH)

JITENDRA BHARADWAJ v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/9101/2024 · 2025-01-06

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:808 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 9101 of 2024 1 - Jitendra Bharadwaj S/o Shri Fenkuram Bharadwaj Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Bokramuda, Satnami Para, P.S. And Tahsil Baloda, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ... applicant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Urga, District Korba Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent For applicant : Mr. Ravindra Sharma, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. R.C.S. Deo, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on board 06.01.2025. 1. This is the third bail application of the applicant. The first bail application of the applicant has been dismissed on 18/06/2024 passed in MCRC No. 3305/2024 on merits. The second bail application of the applicant has also been dismissed on 30/09/2024 passed in MCRC No. 6740/2024 considering that mere examination of some of the witnesses does not amounts to change in the circumstances. Therefore, the present third bail application has been filed by the applicant. 2 2. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that after 30/09/2024, only three witnesses have been examined. The applicant is in jail since 02/02/2024 and the name of the applicant is not in the FIR, final adjudication of the case will take its own time, therefore, he has filed this third bail application. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant. 4. As this Court has already dismissed the second bail application of the applicant on 30.09.2024, considering that mere examination of some of the witnesses does not amount to change in circumstances, and the present is also the same is the situation that after 30/09/2024, three more witnesses have been examined before the learned trial Court. Therefore, it cannot be said that trial of the case is withheld. 5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the trial is in progress and the first bail application has already been dismissed on merits by this Court, I do not find any change in circumstances at present, therefore, this third bail application of the applicant is dismissed. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Sagrika