1 2025:CGHC:19896 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 100 of 2025 Smt. Priynaka Singh W/o Rajat Pratap Singh Aged About 23 Years R/o Quarter No 6/b, Street No 19/a, Sector - 05, Bhilai, P.S. Bhilai Bhatti, Bhilai Tahsil-Durg (C.G.), Pin- 490006 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Rajat Pratap Singh S/o Kailash Pratap Singh Aged About 29 Years R/o Quarter No 8/b, Street No 31, Sector - 04, Bhilai, P.S. Bhilai Bhatti, Bhilai Tahsil-Durg (C.G.), Pin- 490006 2 - Kailash Pratap Singh S/o Parasnath Aged About 56 Years R/o Quarter No 8/b, Street No 31, Sector - 04, Bhilai, P.S. Bhilai Bhatti, Bhilai Tahsil-Durg (C.G.), Pin- 490006 3 - Vishal Singh S/o Kailash Pratap Singh Aged About 25 Years R/o Quarter No 8/b, Street No 31, Sector - 04, Bhilai, P.S. Bhilai Bhatti, Bhilai Tahsil-Durg (C.G.), Pin- 490006 4 - Kalpana Singh W/o Kailash Singh Aged About 54 Years R/o Quarter No 8/b, Street No 31, Sector - 04, Bhilai, P.S. Bhilai Bhatti, Bhilai Tahsil-Durg (C.G.), Pin- 490006 2 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Mahila Thana Incharge, Police Station - Mahila Thana Bhilai, District-Durg, (C.G.) 6 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Supreintendent Of Police, S.P Office Collectorate Premises, Dist.-Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Jha, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sakib Ahmed, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 01/05/2025 The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers: “10.1 It is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and set aside the impugned order passed by the revisional court in Cr.R. No. 243/2024 dated 26.11.2024 and the trial court order dated 22.07.2024 and direct the competent authority/SHO-Mahila Thana, Sector -06 , Bhilai to register the FIR against the respondents, in the interest of justice.” 2. Mr. Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has become infructuous. 3. Mr. Ahmed, learned State counsel as well as Mr. Shrivastava, does not controvert the above submission. 3 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.05.03 11:41:04 +0530