Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46090 (RAJ)

SURAJ KUMAR S/O RAMCHARAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13059/2025 · 2025-10-17

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.13059/2025 Suraj Kumar S/o Ramcharan, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Gorda, Police Station Todabheem, District Karauli (Raj.) (Accused Is Confined In Sub Jail Hindauncity). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar Avasthi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Addl.GA/PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner in connection with FIR No.293/2025, registered at Police Station Todabhim, District Karauli wherein he is charged for offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2) and 303(2) BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged offence against the petitioner is of receiving stolen property from the co-accused. Counsel submits that the co-accused person namely Kaduram has already been granted indulgence of bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.09.2025. Counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since the date of his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13059/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 4. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the alleged offence against the petitioner is of receiving stolen property from the co-accused and looking to the fact that the co-accused person namely Kaduram has already been granted indulgence of bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and the petitioner is in custody since the date of his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude and without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 5. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Suraj Kumar S/o Ramcharan arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KUD/206