Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46090 (PNJ)

NIRVAIL SINGH ALIAS NIRVAIR SINGH ALIAS NIRVAIL AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/21503/2025 · 2025-05-28

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

245 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21503-2025 DECIDED ON:28.05.2025 NIRVAIL SINGH @ NIRVAIR SINGH @ NIRVAIL AND OTHERS …..PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …..RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL. Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Sandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. None for respondents No.2 and 3. ***** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 has been invoked seeking quashing of FIR No. 4, dated 11.02.2025, under Sections 125/115(2)/324(4), 351(2), 191(3), 190 of BNS, 2023 and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Mattewal, Amritsar, and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 07.03.2025 (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties. Despite this being the second consecutive day, none of the parties have appeared, nor is there any representation on behalf of the counsel for the petitioners or respondents No. 2 and 3. Upon perusal of the case file, it is evident that, despite having been granted a final opportunity, none of the parties appeared before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to record their statements regarding the genuineness of the compromise (Annexure P-2). SHAM SUNDER 2025.05.29 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-21503-2025 -2- In view of above, it is apparent that petitioners do not wish to pursue with the present petition. Hence, the same is dismissed for non- prosecution. Ordered accordingly. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 28.05.2025 JUDGE Sham Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SHAM SUNDER 2025.05.29 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document