Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46085 (PAT)

Priyanka Kuwar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CR. MISC./5711/2019 · 2025-03-21

Sandeep Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5711 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2016 Thana- BHABHU(KAIMUR) COMPLAIN C District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Priyanka Kuwar Wife of Late Pintu singh @ Abhimanyu singh R/o village- Sukhpurawa ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Rammurat Singh Son of Jangbahadur Singh R/o village- Sukhpurawa, P.S- Mohania 3. Vijay Kumar singh Son of Jangbahadur Singh R/o village- Sukhpurawa, P.S- Mohania 4. Jai Kumar Singh Son of Jangbahadur Singh R/o village- Sukhpurawa, P.S- Mohania 5. Jang Bahadur Singh Son of Late Jagarnath Singh R/o village- Sukhpurawa, P.S- Mohania 6. Arjun Singh Son of Jagarnath Singh R/o village- Sukhpurawa, P.S- Mohania ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 21-03-2025 This is an application for quashing of the order dated 11.09.2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Kaimur in Cr. Revision no. 148 of 2018 as well as for quashing the order dated 26.08.2016 passed by the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Kaimur At Bhabhua by which he has dismissed the complaint petition under Section 203 of Cr.P.C. 2. The complaint was dismissed by the learned Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5711 of 2019(4) dt.21-03-2025 2/2 Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Kaimur At Bhabhua and the revisional court by its order dated 11.09.2018 which is order impugned, has affirmed the order of the Magistrate. 3. I have gone through the records of the case. I do not find any ground to interfere in the impugned order as well as the order of the Magistrate by which the complaint was dismissed. 4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T