Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46079 (RAJ)

SURESH S/O KANHIRAM @ KHANIRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14084/2025 · 2025-11-27

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48219] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14084/2025 Suresh S/o Kanhiram @ Khaniram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Uchakheda Police Station Bhalta District Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 27/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 279/2025 registered at Police Station Bhalta District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Sections 8, 21, 25, 29 of NDPS Act, 1985. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family, aged about 25 years. It is further submitted that the quantity of recovered contraband is much less than the commercial quantity as specified under the NDPS Act. It is also submitted that the applicant is in custody for a period of approximately two months. Moreover, it is submitted that there are two criminal antecedents registered against the applicant. [2025:RJ-JP:48219] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14084/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has strongly opposed the instant bail application. 4. Having heard the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties and taking note of the fact that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family, aged about 25 years; that the quantity of recovered contraband is much less than the commercial quantity; that the applicant is in custody for a period of approximately two months, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Suresh S/o Kanhiram @ Khaniram shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/130