Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46074 (AP)

Panthangi Chiranjeevi Srinivas, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/22681/2022 · 2025-01-06

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY :: AMARAW 'O Ol M m Co TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22681 OF 9097 Between: 1. Panthangi Chiranjeevi Srinivas S/o. (late) Venkateswara Rao, Hindu, aged 30 years, r/o.Door No.2-25/1, Dwarapudi Village, Mandapeta Mandal, East Godavari District 2. Panthangi Padmavathi, W/o. (late) Venkateswara Rao, Hindu, aged 54 years, r/o.Door No.2-25/1, Dwarapudi Village, Mandapeta Godavari District. Mandal, East ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Tahsildar, Mandapeta Mandal, East Godavari rep by its PrI. Secretary, Revenue District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the circumstances stated i of India praying that in in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction may more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring i)the Respondent in Rejecting the Mutation Application the ground 'Rejected due to legal dispute' by 2021 vide Transaction ID action on the part of 2 t filed by the Petitioners nd on way of Endorsement dt.03-8- TARMU012106943305 and dt.03-8-2021 vide respectively for mutation in the Web- over the land in an extent of Ac. 1-00 cents each in the name of the in Vemulapalli Village, Dwarapudi Panchayath Transaction ID TARMU012106943305 land and for issuing Title Deed-Cum-E-Pass Book R.S.No. 159/1 of Petitioners, situated i Area, Mandapeta Mandal, East Godavari District, is nothing but arbitrary, uniawfui, unreasonable and in violation of the Principles of Natural Justice and Fundamental Rights guaranteed Constitution of India and Rules under Art. 14, 21 and 300-A of the made there under ii)by consequently directing the Respondent no.2 to enter the name of the Petitioners land in R.S.No.159/1 of over the an extent of Ac. 1-00 cents each in the name of the Petitioners, situated in Vemulapalli Village, Dwarapudi Panchayath Area, Mandapeta Mandal, East Godavari District, in the Web-land Revenue Records by mutating their names and to issue E-Pass Book over the said land in the names of the Petitioners as per their Pattdar Pass Book and Title Deed Book bearing No. 1780 and 456. lA NO: 1 OF 9099 Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Grant Interim Orders of Direction directing the Respondent no.2 to consider the application of the Petitioners vide Transaction RMU012106943305, dt.28-06-2021 for mutation in the Web-land and for issuing Title Deed-Cum-E-Pass Book extent of Ac. 1-00 cents each in the name of the Petitioners Vemulapalli Village, Dwarapudi Panchayath Area ‘ Godavari District, pending disposal of the writ Petition. ID over the land in R.S.No.159/1 of an situated in . Mandapeta Mandal, East Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P. RAJESH Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: The Court made the following: ORDER BABU GP FOR REVENUE % .v-i'-'' APHC010333282022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22681/2022 Between: Panthangi Chiranjeevi Srinivas, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.P RAJESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE ...RESPONDENT(S) The Court made the following order: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P.Rajesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that they filed memo dated 22.12.2024 before the Registry stating that they intends to withdraw the writ petition and sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Perused the memo. Permission is accorded. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. Sd/- M SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEWon DFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri P. Rajesh Babu, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:07/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.22681 of 2022 * 17 JUN 2n?5 m ^ . Current Section . ^t£|PsPATCH€S^ 09 DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS