Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46072 (AP)

UPPARA ERANNA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/16848/2024 · 2025-12-02

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010330442024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16848/2024 Between: 1. UPPARA ERANNA, S/O . UPPARA SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 37, R/O. H.NO. 6/31, KURUVA VEEDHI, PEDDAKADUBUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 518323. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT), VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEDDKADUBUR POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in taking action against the complaints made by the petitioner on 29.05.2024 to 3rd respondent and 13.06,2024 to the 2nd respondent is as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the guidelines issued by the apex court in Lalitha Kumari Vs State of UP apart from violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and 2 consequently direct the respondents to take action on the complaints dated 29.05.2024 and 13.06.2024 by the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to take the action on the complaints dated 29.05.2024 and 13.06.2024 made by the petitioner by following the guidelines Issued by the apex court in the Lalitha Kumari Vs State of UP pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VEERAMANI KUKKALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16848 of 2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: <…to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in taking action against the complaints made by the petitioner on 29.05.2024 to 3rd respondent and 13.06,2024 to the 2nd respondent is as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the guidelines issued by the Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari Vs State of UP apart from violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to take action on the complaints dated 29.05.2024 and 13.06.2024 by the petitioner.…= 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Smt. Veeramani Kukkala, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in this matter, since FIR has been registered by the police. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 03.12.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.16848 of 2024 Dated.03.12.2025 UPS 336