SANNY TANEJA S/O SHRI RAJKUMAR TANEJA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/6724/2025 · 2025-11-10
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46070 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46070 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:44984] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6724/2025 Sanny Taneja S/o Shri Rajkumar Taneja, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of 2/350, Jawahar Nagar, Japur City (East), Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. The Station House Officer, Police Station Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur City East, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Kunal Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr.Amit Punia, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 10/11/2025
1. The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking directions for fair, proper and impartial investigation in FIR No.146/2025 registered with Police Station Jawahar Nagar (Jaipur City (East)), District Jaipur City (East).
2. As per the pleadings of the misc. petition that the FIR was registered against the accused person on 13.05.2025, but the Police is not proceeding in a fair and proper manner, so appropriate directions be issued to the Investigating Officer for conducting a fair and impartial investigation.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer and submits that the matter is still at investigation stage and it will take its own time & motion, so directions sought for should not be granted.
[2025:RJ-JP:44984] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6724/2025]
4. Looking to the fact that the FIR has been registered in the month of May, 2025, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is at liberty to move an application under Section 200 Cr.P.C., in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. & Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409, before the Court concerned to get the status report of the investigation.
5. In case, any application, as mentioned above, is submitted by the petitioner before the trial court, appropriate orders shall be passed by the court concerned strictly in accordance with law.
6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /43