Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46068 (AP)

MORRI RAMAKRISHNA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/13376/2023 · 2025-11-30

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010253242023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 13376/2023 Between: 1. MORRI RAMAKRISHNA, S/O MORRI GANAPATHI , AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS OCC . BUSINESS , R/O 3 VILLAGE ,POST PATLIAPATNAM . MANDAL,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. MADDU PARVATEESAM, S/O MADDU THATAYYA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS OCC .BUSINESS , R/O 8 .KORASAVADA VILLAGE ,POST PATHAPATNAM. MANDAL,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DCPARTMENT,A.P,SEERETARIAT.RUILDINGS,VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER RDO, SARUBUJJILI . MANDAL , SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, SARUBUJILI . MANDAL,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER .PRAHARAJUPALEM REVENUE VILLAGE SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 6. SINDIRI ASHOK KUMAR, S/O LATE SINDIRI CHAKRADHARAO 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 13376/2023 MORRI RAMAKRISHNA, S/O MORRI GANAPATHI , AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS OCC . BUSINESS , R/O 3-28,MORRI VEEDI .KORASAVADA VILLAGE ,POST PATLIAPATNAM . MANDAL,SRIKAKULAM MADDU PARVATEESAM, S/O MADDU THATAYYA, AGED ABOUT 51 .BUSINESS , R/O 8-200-3,REDDIKA VEEDI .KORASAVADA VILLAGE ,POST PATHAPATNAM. MANDAL,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DCPARTMENT,A.P,SEERETARIAT.RUILDINGS,VELAGAPUDI, UR DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER RDO, SARUBUJJILI . MANDAL , SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. THE TAHSILDAR, SARUBUJILI . MANDAL,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER VRO, PATHAPATNAM .MANDAL .PRAHARAJUPALEM REVENUE VILLAGE SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT SINDIRI ASHOK KUMAR, S/O LATE SINDIRI CHAKRADHARAO RC,J W.P.No.13376 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI MORRI RAMAKRISHNA, S/O MORRI GANAPATHI , AGED ABOUT 49 28,MORRI VEEDI .KORASAVADA VILLAGE ,POST PATLIAPATNAM . MANDAL,SRIKAKULAM MADDU PARVATEESAM, S/O MADDU THATAYYA, AGED ABOUT 51 3,REDDIKA VEEDI .KORASAVADA VILLAGE ,POST PATHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DCPARTMENT,A.P,SEERETARIAT.RUILDINGS,VELAGAPUDI, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER RDO, SARUBUJJILI . MANDAL THE TAHSILDAR, SARUBUJILI . MANDAL,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. VRO, PATHAPATNAM .MANDAL .PRAHARAJUPALEM REVENUE VILLAGE SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT SINDIRI ASHOK KUMAR, S/O LATE SINDIRI CHAKRADHARAO RC,J W.P.No.13376 of 2023 2 AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS OCC. SOFTWARE ENGINEER R/O D.NO 1- 84 KORASAVADA VILLAGE , PATHAPATNAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT . ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the official respondents 4,and 5, 6 highhandedly Trying to dispossess to the petitioners Residential Site measuring 22' x 80'A/c 195.55 Sq.Yards in Sy.No. 124/12, 124/17, Kodur Panchayat, Praharajupalem Revenue Group, PathapatnamMandalam, registered in our favour vide D.No. 237/2022, is attempted for encroachment by the 6th respondent having Acquired the same by way of registered sale deed on 27-01-2022 only at the instance of the unofficial respondents No.6th Who has nothing to do with the property even without any Notice issued to the petitioners as wholly arbitrary illegal and without jurisdiction and void and violated the principles of natural justice and effected rights of the petitioners guaranteed under article 14.15.19 (1)(g) and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners Residential Site measuring 22' x 80' A/c 195.55 sq.Yards in Sy.No. 124/12, 124/17, Kodur Panchayat, Praharajupalem Revenue Group,PathapatnamMandalam,Srikakulam District. IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directed the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession of the Land in Sy.No. 124/12, 124/17,Residential Site measuring 22' x 80' A/c 195.55 Sq .YardsKodur Panchayat, Praharajupalem Revenue Group, PathapatnamMandalam,Srikakulam District pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KRISHNA RAO M Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT) RC,J W.P.No.13376 of 2023 3 The Court made the following: ORDER This writ petition is filed questioning the action of respondent nos. 4 to 6 in trying to dispossess the petitioners from the residential site admeasuring 22’x80’ i.e. 195.55 sq.yards in Survey Nos.124/12 and 124/17 of Kodur Panchayat, Praharajupalem Revenue Group, Pathapatnam Mandal. 2. This Court granted Interim order directing the respondent authorities not to dispossess the petitioners from the subject property except due process of law. 3. The matter is of the year 2023. Despite lapse of considerable time, the authorities did neither file counter nor place written instructions on record. 4. Considering the same, this writ petition can be disposed of treating the interim order as final order. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondent authorities not to dispossess the petitioners from the subject property except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATED: 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025. RR