Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46067 (AP)

Brahmandam Vijaya Saradhi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLRC/2424/2018 · 2025-12-02

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010668702018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2424/2018 Between: 1. BRAHMANDAM VIJAYA SARADHI, OCC. JUNIOR ASSISTANT, ENDOWMENTS, PITTALAVARI STREET, D.NO.4 /872, NEAR KALAHASTEESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, HYDERABAD. 2. BRAMHANDAM AVANTHI, C/O. K.V.SATYANARAYANA, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. PLOT.NO.66, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to above named petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case to this Honorable Court against the order dated.31.07.2018 passed in F.C.O.P.(MC).No.32/2012 on the file of the Family-cum-VIII Additional District Judge, Prakasam, at Ongole for the following among other. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the order dated 31.07.2018 passed in FCOP(MC).No.32/2012 on the file of the Family-cum-VIII Additional District Judge, Prakasam, at Ongole, pending disposal of Crl.RC and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) O R D E R: This Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the petitioner/accused No.4 under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 8the Cr.P.C.9) against the Order dated 31.07.2018 passed in FCOP(MC).No.32 of 2012 on the file of the learned Family-cum-VIII Additional District Judge, Prakasam, at Ongole. (for short, 8the trial Court9). 2. Heard and perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, this Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the order dated 31.07.2018 passed in FCOP(MC).No.32 of 2012. The FCOP(MC).No.32 of 2012 has been filed by the petitioner/wife under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance for Rs.20,000/-. By impugned order dated 31.07.2018, the trial Court allowed the petition, by granting Rs.5,000/- per month. Against the said order, the petitioner/husband herein preferred the revision. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous and requests to close this matter. 5. Recording the said submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 03.12.2025 M K K THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2424 of 2018 Date: 03.12.2025 M K K 352