Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46061 (RAJ)

UMA SHANKAR MEHRA S/O LATE HEERALAL MEHRA v. CHIEF ENGINEER AND ADDITIONAL SECRETARY

CW/14429/2025 · 2025-11-06

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44604] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14429/2025 Uma Shankar Mehra S/o Late Heeralal Mehra, R/o Near Masimata Mandir, Kotdi, Govardhanpura, Kota, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Chief Engineer And Additional Secretary, Public Works Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. Additional Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Zone- Kota, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan 3. Superintendent Engineer, Public Works Department, Gov Of Rajasthan Circle- Baran, 4. Executivel Engineer, Public Works Department, Gov Of Rajasthan Division- Mangrol, District Baran. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arpit Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 06/11/2025 1. Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi, AGC appears on behalf of respondents and submits that if petitioner submits a representation to the respondents, they will consider the same. 2. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the respondent, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to petitioner to file a representation to the respondents. 3. The petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to [2025:RJ-JP:44604] (2 of 2) [CW-14429/2025] decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /21