Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46059 (AP)

R. RAMALINGESWARA RAO v. THE GOVT OF A.P., REP BY ITS SECRETARY

WP/18941/2003 · 2025-09-24

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010041462003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18941/2003 Between: 1. R. RAMALINGESWARA RAO, S/O SUBBA RAO SECRETARY, SRI DURGAMBA PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., SABBAVARAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVT OF A P REP BY ITS SECRETARY, REP BY SECRETARY, COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COOP OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DY REGISTRAR OF COOP SOCIETIES/, DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 4. SRI DURGAMBA PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE, CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., REP BY ITS PERSON-IN-CHARGE SABBAVARAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings dt 01-09-2003 issued by the 4th respondents as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of 2 the A.P. Cooperative Societies Act and Rules made there under and to set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 23705 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings dt 01-09-2003 issued by the 4th respondent, pending disposal of the above W.P. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A SATYA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR AGRICULTURE 2. GP FOR COOPERATION 3 The Court made the following order: Sri Prakash Buddarapu, learned counsel, representing Sri A.Satya Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the sole petitioner died long back and the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner are not interested to prosecute the case. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 25.09.2025 MP 4 203 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION No.18941 of 2003 Dated : 25.09.2025 MP