[2025:RJ-JP:50488] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19521/2025 1. Priyanka Garasiya D/o Anil Garasiya, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Vpo Jher Moti, Tehsil Gangad Talai, District Banswara, (Raj.) 327601 2. Jivat Kumari Bhagora D/o Manji Lal Bhagora, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo Talaiya, Ps Bichhiwara, Tehsil, Bichhiwara, District Dungarpur, (Raj.)-314801 3. Manisha Kumari Meena D/o Ramesh Chandra, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Kanbai, Nayagaon, Kherwara, District Udaipur, (Raj.) -313804 ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)302005 2. Director, National Health Mission, Swasthya Bhawan, Ashok Nagar, Near Secretariat, Jaipur, Raj, 302005. 3. Project Director, National Health Mission, Swasthay Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Near Civil Lines, Jaipur, Raj, 302005. 4. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Secretary, Rajya Krishi Prabandh Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur-302018 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC Mr. Devranjan for Mr. Nalin G. Narain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 15/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with following prayers: [2025:RJ-JP:50488] (2 of 3) [CW-19521/2025] “It is, therefore, humbly prayed that to kindly accept and allow this writ petition graciously and grant following relief to the humble petitioners: - 1. That issue appropriate order or direction for directing the respondent to consider and treat the candidature of the petitioners under the ST TSP category for the post of Community Health Officer (CHO). 2. That direct the respondents to correct the category of the petitioners in the recruitment record from ST Non-TSP to ST TSP before the release of any result as till now no result is being declared and only documents verification are going on. 3. That any other appropriate order, direction, or relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice may also be passed in favour of the petitioners, including the award of costs of this writ petition.” 2. Issue notice to respondent(s). 3. Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice for respondent nos. 1 to 3 whereas Mr. Devranjan, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Nalin G. Narain accepts notice for respondent no.4. 4. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC and Mr. Nalin G. Narain as counsel for respondent(s). 5. Learned counsel for petitioners while placing reliance upon judgment of Division Bench of this Court in case of Reena Choudhary Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1175/2024) passed by a Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur and also order dated 01.11.2017 in D.B. Civil Special Appeal Writ No. 1700/2017 (Kavita Choudhary Vs. The Registrar (Examination), Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur submits that the issue pertains to correction in the application form and the controversy has already been decided by a Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court [2025:RJ-JP:50488] (3 of 3) [CW-19521/2025] and the writ petition be disposed of in accordance with ratio laid down by the Division Bench. 6. Learned counsel for respondent(s) suggests that the petitioners may submit a representation and respondent(s) will consider the representation. 7. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioners but with a reasoned and speaking order before declaration of final result, from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 8. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /31