Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4605 (UTT)

JAI PRAKASH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/265/2025 · 2025-07-24

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.265 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Krishan Mohan Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Vikash Uniyal, B.H. for the State. 3. State counsel, on instructions, which are taken on record, submitted that after investigation a charge sheet dated 17.05.2025 has been submitted against the petitioners, which is not disputed by counsel for the petitioners. 4. In view of the submission made by counsel for the parties, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous; however it is open to the petitioners to challenge the said charge sheet by filing a C528 application before this Court. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 24.07.2025 SK