[2025:RJ-JP:49588] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14591/2025 Chandra Bhan Sharma Son Of Shri Mawashi Ram, Aged About 68 Years, Resident Of Village Noh, Post Bachhamadi, Tehsil And District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Headquarter, Parivahan Bhawan, Chomu House, Jaipur-302001 (Rajasthan) 2. Deputy General Manager (Administration), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Headquarter, Parivahan Bhawan, Chomu House, Jaipur-302001 (Rajasthan) 3. Deputy General Manager (Administration), And Authorised Disciplinary Officer, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Headquarter, Parivahan Bhawan, Chomu House, Jaipur- 302001 (Rajasthan) 4. Executive Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Headquarter, Parivahan Bhawan, Chomu House, Jaipur-302001 (Rajasthan) 5. Chief Personnel/accounts Officer, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Headquarter, Parivahan Bhawan, Chomu House, Jaipur-302001 (Rajasthan) 6. Chief Manager, Bharatpur Depot, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Scheme No. 14, Sewar-Mathura Bypass, Murwara Road, Bharatpur-321025 (Rajasthan) 7. Chief Manager, Lohagarh Depot, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Heeradas Bus Stand, Lohagarh, Bharatpur-321001 (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 05/12/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:49588] (2 of 3) [CW-14591/2025] 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: 1. It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that the writ petition of the petitioner may kindly be accepted and allowed and the impugned order dated 22.11.2002 (Annexure No. 5) passed by the respondent No. 3 may kindly be quashed and set aside and further the respondents are directed to pay the petitioner all the consequential benefits and forfeited salary of the suspension period. 2. In alternative remedy, the respondents are directed to consider the matter of the petitioner which is pending before the respondents in pursuance of the impugned penalty order dated 22.11.2002 (Annexure No. 5) in which it was kept open that any decision of the Court in criminal case shall be effective separately and after acquittal of the petitioner by the Court below vide judgment dated 15.11.2003, the petitioner has written so many communications to the respondents from the very first date i.e. 20.12.2003 to till date but the respondents have not responded as yet. 2. During course of argument, learned counsel for petitioner submits that a review petition is filed by the petitioner and [2025:RJ-JP:49588] (3 of 3) [CW-14591/2025] same has not been decided and a copy of the review petition is annexed as Annexure-7. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner, the petitioner is given liberty to file representation mentioning about the pending review petition and other grounds to the respondents and respondents are directed to consider the decide the representation including the review petition within 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition along with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /438