Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46047 (PNJ)

MANJEET SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/21194/2025 · 2025-04-24

Alok Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (109) MANJEET SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, 1. read with Section 528 of BNSS for respondent Nos.2 and 3 vide order dated 01.04.2025 (Annexure P learned Sessions Judge, Ferozepur. 2. averments, submits that he may be permitted to to enable him to approach the Court of competent jurisdiction, which granted the bail, to seek its cancellation. 3. 4. of the counsel for the petitioner and shall not be treated as any direction or expression of opinion on the merits of the case. April 24, 2025 manju IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH MANJEET SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Abhishek Chha, Advocate for Mr. R.K. Kachura, Advocate the petitioner. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) Present petition has been filed under Section 483 (3) of BNSS read with Section 528 of BNSS for cancellation respondent Nos.2 and 3 vide order dated 01.04.2025 (Annexure P learned Sessions Judge, Ferozepur. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while protecting all his averments, submits that he may be permitted to to enable him to approach the Court of competent jurisdiction, which granted the bail, to seek its cancellation. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. It is made clear that the liberty granted is only on the r of the counsel for the petitioner and shall not be treated as any direction or expression of opinion on the merits of the case. April 24, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21194-2025 Date of Decision:- 24.04.2025 ……PETITIONER ……RESPONDENTS ALOK JAIN Mr. Abhishek Chha, Advocate for Mr. R.K. Kachura, Advocate the petitioner. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 (3) of BNSS cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent Nos.2 and 3 vide order dated 01.04.2025 (Annexure P-3) passed by Learned counsel for the petitioner, while protecting all his averments, submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition to enable him to approach the Court of competent jurisdiction, which granted Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. the liberty granted is only on the request of the counsel for the petitioner and shall not be treated as any direction or expression of opinion on the merits of the case. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No ……PETITIONER ……RESPONDENTS Present petition has been filed under Section 483 (3) of BNSS of anticipatory bail granted to 3) passed by Learned counsel for the petitioner, while protecting all his withdraw the present petition to enable him to approach the Court of competent jurisdiction, which granted equest of the counsel for the petitioner and shall not be treated as any direction or Manju 2025.04.25 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document