Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46046 (CHH)

VAISHALI GAURKHEDE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/57/2020 · 2025-03-28

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:14993 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 57 of 2020 1 - Vaishali Gaurkhede W/o Nandlal Gaurkhede Aged About 43 Years Caste Mahar, Resident Of Aditi Nivas Near Of Ramdarbar Get, Kota Road Gudyari Raipur , Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Tribal Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan , Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Love Kumar Ramteke, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Shubham Bajpai, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 28-03-2025 Heard. 1) Learned State counsel would submit that the order passed by the Sub- Divisional Officer (Revenue), Raipur (C.G.) is appealable according to the provisions of Section 5 of the Chhattisgarh Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Social Status Certification) Act, 2013 and thus, the present petition is not maintainable. Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.03.28 17:38:20 +0530 2 2) At this stage, Mr. Ramteke, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would seek permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to prefer an appeal before the appropriate authority. 3) Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, if the petitioner prefers an appeal before the Appellate Authority, it is expected that the Appellate Authority shall decide the appeal expeditiously taking into consideration the fact that the matter remained pending for a considerable period before this Court. 4) Certified copy of the impugned order be returned after retaining its xerox copy. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya