[2025:RJ-JP:50506] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19282/2025 Suman W/o Lt. Shri Sanjeev Kumar, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Ward No. 2 Aakwa Khudi Bari Post Kudi Badi District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The Principal, Shahid Kalyan Singh Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Khood, District Sikar. 4. Shri Banwari Lal Mahariya, Principal, Shahid Kalyan Singh Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Khood District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.P Saini for Mr. Sandeep Kalwaniya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar and Ms. Pooja Sharma for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 15/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “i) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the impugned order dated 22.09.2025 (Annex.1) Impugned Relieving order dated 25.09.2025 (Annex.2) passed by the respondents and Impugned Order dated 19.11.2025 passed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, [2025:RJ-JP:50506] (2 of 3) [CW-19282/2025] Jaipur in Appeal No. 4566/2025 may kindly be quashed and set aside. ii) By issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the Respondents may kindly be directed to continue the petitioner on the post of Principal at Shahid Kalyan Singh Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Khood District Sikar.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon notification dated 30.05.2022 issued by the Administrative Reforms Department of Govt. of Rajasthan and further reproduced in guideline dated 14.07.2022 by the Education Department submits that the respondent nos. 1 and 2 under an obligation to give effect to the policy guideline as issued from time to time by the administrative reforms department and also issued with approval of the Government to the Department. He further submitted that the petitioner has approached Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur but no stay was granted to the petitioner but in appeal no. 4363/2025 and 4362/2025 identically placed Neelam Mahawar and Archana Sharma were granted stay orders and they were continued at same place by staying the operation of the order. 3. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents and they submitted that due to administrative exigency the transfer has been effected but considering the grievance as raised by the petitioner, the petitioner is free to make a representation to the Department, which will consider the representation on [2025:RJ-JP:50506] (3 of 3) [CW-19282/2025] the grounds raised by the petitioner and this petition can be disposed at this stage. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation but in case of deviation, with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. In the meanwhile, impugned order dated 22.09.2025 and 25.09.2025 qua the present petitioner shall remain stayed till disposal of the representation, by the respondents. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /40