Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41128 of 2025 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40162 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Bhojpur ======================================================
1. Arbind Kumar Singh @ Mantu S/O Kamta singh R/O Village- Dharampur, Post- Naya Mohamadpur, P.S- Koilwar, Distt.- Bhojpur.
2. Santosh Kumar Singh S/o Kamta Singh R/O Village- Dharampur, Post- Naya Mohamadpur, P.S- Koilwar, Distt.- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Kamta Singh S/O Late Madhura Singh R/O Village- Dharampur, Post- Naya Mohammadpur, P.S- Koelwar, Distt.- Bhojpur.
3. Dewanti Devi W/O Kamta Singh R/O Village- Dharampur, Post- Naya Mohammadpur, P.S- Koelwar, Distt.- Bhojpur.
4. Arun Kumar Singh S/O Kamta Singh JC No. 570565, Subedar Arun Kumar Singh, Director General Information System, Bhiho, General State Branch, IHU of MOD, (Arms) DGIF, In Claim Setukar Ram More New Delhi-
110010.
5. Manoj Kumar Singh S/O Kamta Singh R/O Village- Dharampur, Post- Naya Mohammadpur, P.S- Koetwar, Distt.- Bhojpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh For the State : Mr. Rabindra Kumar- A.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 27-06-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP Sri Rabindra Kumar for the State.
2. From perusal of the pleadings made in the restoration application, it manifests that the same has been filed for restoring Cr. Misc. No.40162 of 2024, which was also a restoration application, which was filed for restoring Cr. Misc.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41128 of 2025(2) dt.27-06-2025 2/2 No.12963 of 2018, which stood dismissed for default by an
order dated 08.01.2024, as such, the instant restoration application has been filed for restoring Cr. Misc. No.12963 of
2018.
3. After going through the grounds taken in the restoration application, the Court is not inclined to entertain the application.
4. The restoration application is dismissed.
vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T