Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46040 (RAJ)

LOKESH KUMAR S/O PAPPURAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15227/2025 · 2025-11-24

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47464] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15227/2025 Lokesh Kumar S/o Pappuram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Nangal Dharmu, P.s. Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umashanker Pandey For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 24/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 315/2025 registered at Police Station Rajgarh District Alwar for the offence(s) under Section 109(1) of BNS, 2023 and Section 27 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that applicant is a sole bread earner of the family, aged about 22 years. It is further submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter. It is also submitted that the FIR reflects that a gun shot was fired and window glass was hit by the same, howsoever no specific allegations against the applicant has been leveled in the FIR. Moreover, it is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant and the applicant is in custody ever since 27.10.2025. [2025:RJ-JP:47464] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15227/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant bail application. 4. Having heard the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties, considering the fact that applicant is a sole bread earner of the family, aged about 22 years; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant; that the applicant is in custody ever since 27.10.2025 and looking to the overall facts but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Lokesh Kumar S/o Pappuram shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/207