1 2025:CGHC:40352 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 317 of 2015 1. Sakuntala Bai Wd/o Late Heera Lal, Aged About 66 Years R/o Bramhanpara, Ward No.7, Rajim, Revenue And Civil District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2. Sanat Kumar S/o Late Heera Lal, Aged About 50 Years R/o Bramhanpara, Ward No.7, Rajim, Revenue And Civil District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh 3. Ritesh Kumar S/o Late Heera Lal, Aged About 43 Years R/o Bramhanpara, Ward No.7, Rajim, Revenue And Civil District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh 4. Jitesh Kumar S/o Late Heera Lal, Aged About 40 Years R/o Bramhanpara, Ward No.7, Rajim, Revenue And Civil District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh 5. Bharti Pansari W/o Mahesh Pansari, Aged About 35 Years D/o Heera Lal, R/o Baba Pan Masala, Chameli Chowk, Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh .........Defendants, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s) versus Kailash Kumar Pansari S/o Late Bhaiya Lal Pansari, Aged About 50 Years R/o Baniyapara, Devshri Road, Dhamtari, Tahsil And Revenue And Civil District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ..........Plaintiff, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2025.08.13 10:48:00 +0530 2 For Appellant (s) : Mr. Ankur Gupta, Advocate on behalf of Mr. P.K. Patel, For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishikant Mahobia, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 12/08/2025 1. Counsel for the plaintiff would submit that out of the court a compromise arrived at between the plaintiff and the defendants therefore, he does not want to pursue the appeal in future. 2. Counsel for the defendants did not oppose the aforesaid prayer. 3. Considering the submission and the fact that since the parties have already settled their dispute out side fo the Court, therefore, the appeal is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge santosh