[2025:RJ-JP:51382] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19851/2025 Omprakash Son Of Shri Hajari Lal, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Village Post Ronsi, Tehsil Nadauti, District Karauli Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Karauli, Rajasthan. 3. Block Chief Medical Officer, Gudhachandraji, District Karauli. 4. Executive Engineer, Panchana Sinchai Pariyojna, Division Karauli. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shribhan Gurjar For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “It is therefore most respectfully prayed that Your Lordships may graciously be pleased to allow this writ petition and the respondents may kindly be directed to grant notional, Seniority and ACP benefits to the petitioner as given to his junior person Shri Harbhajan Purviya appointed under same recruitment process. Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:51382] (2 of 2) [CW-19851/2025] Cost of the writ petition may also be awarded to the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 03.04.2019 in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12549/2018 titled as “Jetha Ram & Ors. Vs. Rajasthan High Court & Anr. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid ratio. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Jetha Ram (supra) passed by this Court, if applicable upon the facts of the case. 4. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended, otherwise the respondents are at liberty to deviate and decide with reasoned and speaking order. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /149